CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENCY:

Spring 2006 Requirements and Readings

Political Studies 20
MW 4:15
Professor Dana Ward
Office: A222
Phone: 73177
Email: dward@pitzer.edu
Office Hours:
Mon  3:15-4:15
Tues 11:00-12:00*
Wed  3:15-4:15
Thur 11:00-12:00*

*Note: TuTh office hours may be canceled if I have to attend fieldgroup meetings and other events, but feel free to stop by any time I am in my office.

 The major goal of this course is to provide an understanding of the relationship between Congress and the presidency. To reach that goal we must first acquire an understanding of each institution, including the different constituencies served, varying organizational structures, and the often overlapping responsibilities with which each institution is charged. Particularly with Congress, an understanding of the historical roots of present organizational structures is essential. To a large extent Congress is an on-going body that remains unchanged from election to election. The presidency, on the other hand, undergoes fundamental change with each new administration (with the large exception of the executive bureaucracy), and each administration undergoes its own developmental process. Thus, the goals, values and character of each chief executive add considerable variation to the office of the president.

 Given these different contexts, the course will focus on the roots of present operating procedures. We will pay considerable attention to the committee system, the electoral connection, and the legislative process. At the end of the course you should have an extensive knowledge of basic operating procedures in Congress, legislative terms, and the precise means by which a bill becomes a law. You should understand the different institutional responsibilities attached to Congress and the presidency and the basic ways in which the presidency has developed and been organized. The history of particular administrations, the personality of recent presidents, the powers of the president, executive leadership and policy making will be the major foci of our study of the presidency. Finally, throughout the course we will concentrate on the relationship between Congress and the president.

COURSE REQUIREMENTS

 A. READINGS: The dates on the syllabus are the due dates for the readings listed under each section. It will require roughly two hours to complete each reading assignment. All readings are required and MUST be read BEFORE the date on the syllabus. This point cannot be over-emphasized. Classroom discussion is an extremely important part of this course. Therefore it is essential that you keep up with the reading requirements. This is not a course from which you will benefit if you are in the habit of putting off reading until forced to read by exam deadlines.

 The following books have been ordered for sale at the Huntley Book Store and are required reading. Most of the books are also on reserve at Honnold.

  1. Davidson, D. and Oleszek, J., Congress and Its Members, 10th ed.
  2. Dodd, L.C. & Oppenheimer, B.I., Congress Reconsidered, 8th ed.
  3. Pika, J.A., Maltese, J.A. & Thomas, N.C., The Politics of the Presidency, 6th ed.
  4. Nelson, M., The Presidency and the Political System, 8th ed.
  5. Oleszek, W. J. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process 6th ed.

 B. PARTICIPATION: All students are required to participate in the congressional simulation during the week of March 27-31. The simulation will require substantial time commitments, particularly during the evening from 6:30-10:00 of that week. There will be no Monday or Wednesday class meeting during the simulation week. If you have evening commitments, then you should either not take this course, or you must make arrangements to be relieved of those commitments during the simulation. FAILURE TO PARTICIPATE WILL RESULT IN AUTOMATIC FAILURE IN THE COURSE.

 The simulation is a fun, but intense, experience. It will take place between March 27 and March 31. Three classes will be participating in the simulation: ours, a class from CMC, and a class from Pomona. Some of you will play the roles of journalists and lobbyists, but most of you will assume various roles in the Bush administration. Journalists will report on the simulation and should have web skills and will also prepare the "Meet the Press" session which will be videotaped and played at the simulation opening. The lobbyists will represent different sides of issues covered this year: a military bill, an economic stimulus bill and an energy bill. There may be lobbyists from other classes also. The job of the lobbyist will be to persuade the Senate to pass legislation favorable to their cause. All roles will be assigned during the third week of class and require extensive research on the particular Executive officer, lobbyist, or journalist you will play. This year's role assignments can be found by following this link and the Democratic Senators can be found by following this link. The Simulation Rules can be found here. The schedule will be found here.

 In addition, all students will be responsible for two five minute presentations, one covering "This Week in Congress" and one covering "This Week at the White House". Each Wednesday, the first twenty minutes of class will be devoted to current events on Capitol Hill and in the Oval Office. You will up-date on-going stories in the news and keep the class informed of important pending legislation and events. There are five main purposes to this exercise: 1) To familiarize yourself with useful sources on Congress and the president, e.g., CQ's Weekly Report, The National Journal, The Christian Science Monitor, The New York Times, The Washington Post and various online sources including those linked on this syllabus; 2) To keep yourself and the class up-to-date on current issues; 3) to provide an opportunity to sharpen your organizational and oral skills; 4) to provide a forum for discussion of topical issues; and 5) to promote classroom cooperation. The students reporting on Congress and the students reporting on the White House will have to consult with each other to insure a coherent ten minutes and to avoid redundancy. I strongly encourage you to subscribe to The New York Times. I will pass out information on discount subscriptions during the first week of class.

 C. EXAMS: There will be two graded exams. The first exam will be given March 6 in class and will constitute ten percent of your final grade. It will cover lectures and reading material up to and including the March 6 readings. The second exam will be given May 3 and will constitute ten percent of your final grade. The second exam will cover lectures and reading material from March 8 through May 3 and will also constitute ten percent of your final grade. The focus of the exams will be on basic facts and concepts. There will be short answer questions in which you will demonstrate basic familiarity with terms, concepts, operating procedures and the like. Roughly half the first exam will require using a list of terms to describe how a bill becomes a law. Roughly half the second exam will require using a list of terms to describe how budgets are passed.

 D. PAPERS: There are three required papers. The first paper is due February 22 and will constitute 15 percent of your final grade. It should be a five to seven page paper focusing on the role you will play in the simulation. If your role is an executive role, the paper should include a history of the office, a discussion of what role the office plays in the executive branch, a brief political biography focusing on the current occupant and the occupant's issue positions, and a comparison with previous office holders. If you are playing a journalist or lobbyist you will become "expert" in the area that lobbyist or journalist covers and the paper will also assess the literatures on lobbying or journalism and the public policy process. Most the paper will be a "policy analysis" of issues, but perhaps a quarter of the paper will focus on the individual journalist or lobbyist. The second paper is due April 12 and will also constitute 15 percent of your final grade. It should be a five to seven page paper on any topic covered in the course (except the topic of presidential or congressional elections), but you must clear your topic with me well before the paper is due. The third paper is due on May 8, and should be ten to twelve pages in length. The third paper will focus on the relationship between Congress and the president during a post-war administration of your choice (i.e., from Truman through the current administration). While the paper is not due until the end of the semester, you should begin working on it tomorrow. Decide which administration you will analyze and begin reading background material now. If you wait until the last half of the course you will be too busy and will do an inadequate job. This is a paper you should be thinking about for three months, not three days. The final paper will constitute 30 percent of your final grade. For all papers, I expect proper citations of all sources. I much prefer APA style and you can find online guides to APA style, including internet citations at PsychWeb

 LATE PAPERS WILL BE DOWN GRADED ONE GRADE FOR EACH 24 HOUR PERIOD THE PAPER IS LATE (e.g., from an A- to an AB). In addition, it is quite likely that I will simply grade late papers without providing my usual commentary.

 E. PEER EVALUATIONS: There are two components to peer evaluations. Two thirds of the peer evaluation will be based on the simulation and will constitute ten percent of your final grade. By the first class after the simulation has been completed, each student will email to me (dward@pitzer.edu) an evaluation of each student's performance in the simulation. Type the name of the student being evaluated, followed by a LETTER GRADE (e.g., A, A-, AB, B+, B, etc.). The evaluators will remain anonymous. The grade given should reflect your judgment of the student's understanding of the role played by the student, the student's knowledge of the legislative process and their contribution to the group effort. Some thought and consideration should be put into the evaluation. Perfunctory evaluations provide no benefit to anyone.

 The second component of the peer evaluations is your evaluation of each of the other students' contribution to your understanding of Congress and the presidency. Did the student participate actively in class or outside class? How good were the students' oral presentations? In short, how effective was each student's participation in class in terms of adding to your knowledge of Congress and the presidency? Use the same format as in the simulation peer evaluations, i.e, email me the evaluation. Below the student's name and the assigned grade type as thorough and thoughtful an analysis as possible of the basis of your evaluation, emphasizing strengths and weaknesses and making suggestions for improvement. The second peer evaluations are due April 26 and will constitute five percent of your final grade. The combined peer evaluations will constitute fifteen percent of the final grade.

 F. SELF EVALUATIONS: On Monday, January 23, each of you will submit a statement of your personal goals for this course. This statement should be as specific and detailed as possible. Plan your method for meeting the responsibilities of this course, set weekly goals and time schedules, or whatever will help you to think about why you are taking this particular course and how it fits in with your overall learning goals. Then, on the last day of class, you will turn in a self evaluation in which you will analyze how well you met your goals, how your goals changed, and what unforeseen goals emerged. You will then assign yourself an over-all grade based on your performance in this course and that grade will constitute five percent of your final grade.

Online Resources

 G. There are a number of internet links you will find useful for preparing papers, presentations, and research on your simulation role. Over the semester more links will be added, but for now try these links:

A Bill Becomes A Law
The American Presidency - Selected Resources: An Informal Reference Guide
Anti-Federalist Papers
Buying the Presidency
Campaign Finance Institute
Congressional Collections at Archival Repositories
Congress Link (Dirksen Center)
Enactment of a Law
Research Guide to Election Resources
Federalist Papers
Federal Web Locator
Forum on the Role of the White House Chief of Staff
Full Text of Supreme Court Decisions
Government Resources
House of Representatives Web Site
Impeachment Links
The Impeachment of Andrew Johnson
Internet Resources
Mother Jones 400 (Election finance)
National Archives and Records Administration
News Batch (covers policies)
Political Science Research Resources
POTUS (Presidents of the United States Database)
Presidential Archives and Centers
Presidential Elections 1860-1864
Presidential Elections and the Electoral College
Presidents Resource Site
The President Web Group
Presidential/Congressional Relations Conference
Public Agenda Online (policy and public opinion)
Public Affairs Video Archives (C-SPAN)
Reference Guide to the American Presidency
Research Tools
Roll Call
Senate Web Site
This Nation: The American Government and Politics Portal
Thomas (Library of Congress, House and Senate site)
U.S. Constitution
U.S. Official Job Approval Ratings (Presidents, Senators, and Govenors)
U.S. Presidency Links (Excellent on all topics related to Presidency)
Vanishing Voter Project (Presidential Elections)
Voter Information Services
Votes Database: browse every vote in the U.S. Congress since 1991.
The White House
White House Transitions and Organizational Charts
WWW.Policy.com
Your Congress (sign up to receive everything your Congressman says!)



GRADING WEIGHT SUMMARY

First Exam on March 6
Second Exam on May 3
First Paper due February 22
Second Paper due April 12
Final Paper due May 8
Peer Evaluations
Self Evaluation
  10 Percent
  10 Percent
  15 Percent
  15 Percent
  30 Percent
  15 Percent
   5 Percent



 

SYLLABUS

Jan 18: Orientation

Studying the Presidency

Jan 23: Pious, R., The Presidency, pp. 1-15. (on reserve)

Nelson, M., "Evaluating the Presidency," in The Presidency & The Political System, ed. Nelson, pp. 1-23;

"The Changing Presidency" in Pika, Maltese and Thomas, The Politics of the Presidency, pp. 1-26.

The Evolution of the Presidency

Jan 25: Pious, R., The Presidency, pp. 19-80. (On reserve)
Jan 30: Pious, R., The Presidency, pp. 81-107. (On reserve);

Rockman, B.A., "The American Presidency in Comparative Perspective: Systems, Situations, and Leaders," in The Presidency & The Political System, ed. Nelson, pp. 28-54.

The Evolution and Study of Congress

Feb  1: Davidson, R. & Oleszek, W., Congress and Its Members, pp. 3-9, 13-36;

Sinclair, B., "The New World of U.S. Senators," in Dodd, L.C. and Oppenheimer, B.I., Congress Reconsidered, pp. 1-20;

Dodd, L.C. and Oppenheimer, B.I., "A Decade of Republican Control: The House of Representatives, 1995-2005," in Dodd, L.C. and Oppenheimer, B.I., Congress Reconsidered, pp. 23-51.

Presidential Leadership

Feb  6: Tulis, J.K., "The Two Constitutional Presidencies," in The Presidency & The Political
System, ed. Nelson, pp. 57-84;

Skowronek, S., "Presidential Leadership in Political Time," in The Presidency & The Political System, ed. Nelson, pp. 89-133.

Congress: The Electoral Connection

Feb  8: Davidson, R. & Oleszek, W., Congress and Its Members, pp. 38-78, 81-115;

Erikson, R.E. and Wright, G.C., "Voters, Candidates, and Issues in Congressional Elections," in Dodd, L.C. and Oppenheimer, B.I., Congress Reconsidered, pp. 77-102;

Fiorina, M.P., "Keystone Reconsidered," in Dodd, L.C. and Oppenheimer, B.I., Congress Reconsidered, pp. 159-177;

Hernson, P.S,., "The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act and Congressional Elections," in Dodd, L.C. and Oppenheimer, B.I., Congress Reconsidered, pp. 107-132.

Electing The President

Feb 13: Quirk, P. "Presidential Competence," in The Presidency & The Political System,
ed. Nelson, pp. 136-164;

Milkis, S. N., "The Presidency and Political Parties" in The Presidency & The Political System, ed. Nelson, pp. 341-372.
Feb 15: Pious, R., "The Presidency and the Nominating Process," in The Presidency & The Political
System, ed. Nelson, pp. 195-217;

Aldrich, J., J. Griffin, and J. Rickershauser, "The Presidency and the Election Campaign: Altering Voters' Priorities in the 2004 Election," in The Presidency & The Political System, ed. Nelson, pp. 219-233;

"Election Politics," in Pika, J.A., Maltese, J.A., & Thomas, N.C., The Politics of the Presidency, pp. 30-70.

The President and the Public

Feb 20: "Public Politics," in Pika, J.A., Maltese, J.A., & Thomas, N.C., The Politics of the
Presidency, pp. 78-118;

Hetherington, M.J. and S. Globetti, "The Presidency and Political Trust," in The Presidency & The Political System, ed. Nelson, pp. 235-252;

Tichenor, D.J., "The Presidency and Interest Groups: Allies, Adversaries, and Policy Leadership," in The Presidency & The Political System, ed. Nelson, pp. 311-336.

Congressional Homestyle, Hillstyle, and Party "Obligations"

Feb 22: Davidson, R. & Oleszek, W., Congress and Its Members, pp. 116-146, 149-191;

Oleszek, W.J., Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, pp. 110-149.

Congressional Committees and Procedures

Feb 27: Davidson, R. & Oleszek, W., Congress and Its Members, pp. 193-234, 237-270;

Aldrich, J.H,. and D.W. Rohde, "Congressional Committees in a Partisan Era," in Dodd, L.C. and Oppenheimer, B.I., Congress Reconsidered, pp. 249-267.

Congressional Procedures

Mar  1: Oleszek, W.J., Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, pp. 1-35, 76-106,
153-183.

The Office of the Presidency

Mar  6: Burke, J.P., "The Institutional Presidency," in The Presidency & The Political System,
ed. Nelson, pp. 383-405;

"Executive Politics," in Pika, J.A., Maltese, J.A., & Thomas, N.C., The Politics of the Presidency, pp. 214-248;

"Legislative Oversight," in Oleszek, W.J., Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, pp. 289-311.
Mar  8: Rudalevige, A., "The President and the Cabinet," in The Presidency & The Political System,
ed. Nelson, pp. 533-553;

Lewis, D.E., "Presidents and the Bureaucracy: Management Imperatives in a Separation of Powers System," in The Presidency & The Political System, ed. Nelson, pp. 410-425;

Oleszek, W.J., Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, pp. 187-214.

Congressional and Presidential Decision Making

Mar 20: "Deliberation in Congress," Davidson, R. & Oleszek, W., Congress and Its Members,
pp. 272-301;

"The Politics of Domestic Policy," in Pika, J.A., Maltese, J.A., & Thomas, N.C., The Politics of the Presidency, pp. 293-317;

Gordon, J. B., "The (Dis)Integration of the House Appropriations Committee: Revisiting The Power of the Purse," in Dodd, L.C. and Oppenheimer, B.I., Congress Reconsidered, pp. 271-292.

Congress and the Executive

Mar 22: Davidson, R. & Oleszek, W., Congress and Its Members, pp. 305-332;

Davidson, R. & Oleszek, W., Congress and Its Members, pp. 335-361;

Dickinson, M., "The President and Congress" in The Presidency & The Political System, ed. Nelson, pp. 455-477;

"Legislative Politics," in Pika, J.A., Maltese, J.A., & Thomas, N.C., The Politics of the Presidency, pp. 175-207.

Congress and Political Parties & Senate Procedures

Mar 27: Smith, S.S. and Gamm, G., "The Dynamics of Party Government in Congress,"
in Dodd, L.C. and Oppenheimer, B.I., Congress Reconsidered, pp. 181-202;

Oleszek, W.J., Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, pp. 217-251, 255-285.

The Budget Process & Organized Interests

Mar 29: Davidson, R. & Oleszek, W., Congress and Its Members, pp. 395-419 and 421-449;

"The Politics of Economic Policy," in Pika, J.A., Maltese, J.A., & Thomas, N.C., The Politics of the Presidency, pp. 321-355;

Oleszek, W.J., Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, pp. 39-73.

The Executive, Congress and the Judiciary

Apr  3: "Judicial Politics," in Pika, J.A., Maltese, J.A., & Thomas, N.C.,
The Politics of the Presidency, pp. 257-286;

Binder, S. and F. Maltzmann, "Congress and the Politics of Judicial Appointments," In Dodd, L.C. and Oppenheimer, B.I., Congress Reconsidered, pp. 297-316.
Apr  5: Davidson, R. & Oleszek, W., Congress and Its Members, pp. 363-391;

Yalof, D.A., "The Presidency and the Judiciary," in The Presidency & The Political System, ed. Nelson, pp. 481-504.

War and Diplomacy (1)

Apr 10: Davidson, R. & Oleszek, W., Congress and Its Members, pp. 450-474;

"The Politics of National Security Policy," in Pika, J.A., Maltese, J.A., & Thomas, N.C., The Politics of the Presidency, pp. 360-390.

The Psychological Presidency

Apr 12: Nelson, M., "The Psychological Presidency," in The Presidency & The Political System,
ed. Nelson, pp. 170-191;

Presidential Character and Performance," in Pika, J.A., Maltese, J.A., & Thomas, N.C., The Politics of the Presidency, pp. 128-167.

War and Diplomacy (2)

Apr 17: Polsky, A. J., "The Presidency at War," in The Presidency & The Political System,
ed. Nelson, pp. 557-573;

Wolfensberger, R. R., "Congress and Policymaking in an Age of Terrorism," in Dodd, L.C. and Oppenheimer, B.I., Congress Reconsidered, pp. 343-360;

"George W. Bush: Challenges of a Wartime President," in Pika, J.A., Maltese, J.A., & Thomas, N.C., The Politics of the Presidency, pp. 397-426.

The President and the Public II

April 19: Miroff, B., "The Presidency and the Public: Leadership as Spectacle,"
in The Presidency & The Political System, ed. Nelson, pp. 255-280;

Jacobs, L.R., "The President and the Press: The Paradox of the White House Communications War," in The Presidency & The Political System, ed. Nelson, pp. 283-306.
April 24: Cooper, J., "From Congressional to Presidential Preeminence: Power and Politics in
Late 19th Century America and Today," in Dodd, L.C. and Oppenheimer, B.I., Congress Reconsidered, pp. 363-391;

Dodd, L.C. "Re-Envisioning Congress: Theoretical Perspectives on Congressional Change," in Dodd, L.C. and Oppenheimer, B.I., Congress Reconsidered, pp. 411-442.

Judgment and Reform

April 26: Quirk, P. & Nesmith, B., "Divided Government and Policy Making: Negotiating the
Laws," in The Presidency & The Political System, ed. Nelson, pp. 508-527;

Schickler, E. and K. Pearson, "The House Leadership in an Era of Partisan Warfare," in Dodd, L.C. and Oppenheimer, B.I., Congress Reconsidered, pp. 207-224.
May  1: Evans, C.L. and D. Lipinski, "Obstruction and Leadership in the U.S. Senate,"
in Dodd, L.C. and Oppenheimer, B.I., Congress Reconsidered, pp. 227-245;

Oppenheimer, B.I., "Deep Red and Blue Congressional Districts: The Causes and Consequences of Declining Party Competitiveness," in Dodd, L.C. and Oppenheimer, B.I., Congress Reconsidered, pp. 135-155.
May  3: "The Two Congresses and the American People," in
Davidson, R. & Oleszek, W., Congress and Its Members, pp. 476-495;

Hibbing, J.R. and C. W. Larimer, "What the American Public Wants Congress to Be," in Dodd, L.C. and Oppenheimer, B.I., Congress Reconsidered, pp. 55-74.